The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: W800 Service Updated




Hi Mal

> I've updated the W800RF32 service to handle messages from X10
> security RF devices

Nice work....wish now i didnt have the cbus wireless kit otherwise i would
get one of those receiver units.....

Does the plugin require updating due to the new release ???

Bob will be looking forward to trying this im sure

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mal Lansell" <mlansell@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: [ukha_xpl] W800 Service Updated


>
>
> I've updated the W800RF32 service to handle messages from X10
> security RF devices
>
> Unfortunately, the security devices are intended to be used only with
> their base stations, rather than as general X10 controls.  The
> messages they send have no relation to any of the standard X10
> functions.  Therefore, the service sends security messages using the
> remote.basic schema (standard X10 RF commands are still sent using
> X10.basic).
>
> It uses two of the remote.basic message body elements -
>     keys=num1 (where num1 is the keycode sent by the device 0-255)
>     device=num2 (where num2 is the id of the security device 0-255)
>
> This should be sufficient to distinguish between controllers, and to
> use their commands to trigger determinators etc.
>
> Mal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
> To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
> To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.