Re: Re: PIC testing WAS OSD ALERT

[Frank Mc Alinden]

Hi Steve

That was the problem i believe i was going to have if i used the
Exclusive / Release command.... I would have to save the Source of every
message
sent in case it was an Exclusive / Release command........At the moment
Exclusive is a clear command ....maybe later....

Did you ever get round to having a go at the 1 wire Hubs????

Frank

----- Original Message -----
From: <a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=As1qu0igA1rD74REitxUlWkJO6pS4Y1TL0jhXIPJ1wjQyYMNU6KXmXuVf3nHcTPwrkGeY3KJkumKsgFuL7G99I0xHVD7">steve.cooper@u...</a>
To: <a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=eK6N3kvwuAO7qrjgg3FGWNPsZ8eM_7mGO8ok1D2iJDrwM_o-JcS_GPsvEj7A4qe76ZaXnxejB18tJqKV_V68WGs">ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx</a>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_xpl] Re: PIC testing WAS OSD ALERT



> Sorry dont fully understand what your saying here...

Just that the way that I view a xPL message is that the top header
information contains all the information that is required for a device to
determine whether a message is for it. Once it has established this it can
discard the header part and deal with the guts of the message that is
contained in the body without having to use the header and body together.

As I say it's only my personal view of how I see it. It helps me think when
things get fuzzy.

S.



___________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.
Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.
Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.
Thank you for your assistance.
___________________________________________________________________________