RE: Re: NAS or WHS

["Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Phil, quick CBUS question if I may... - I reckon I already know the
answer, I just need a sanity check...

Is it in any way possible to get an E2000 switch to trigger a scene
stored in another unit? - I tried to reference a trigger group in the
key assignment, but the unit only allows me to select from groups in the
lighting application, - I'm thinking this is because the E2000 only
supports one application at a time? - I already have other keys on the
unit assigned to lighting groups...

If my understanding is correct, the only way I could do it is if *all*
the keys on the unit are added to groups in the trigger control
application, - that, or do what I want in the PAC instead....

Cheers.

Paul G.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
> Phil Harris
> Sent: 30 November 2008 01:18
> To: 'Phil Harris'; UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
>
> Hmmm ... after a little more digging it seems that shares on WHS can
> either
> be duplicated or not - seems that MS don't support "RAID"
like
strategies
> under WHS - is that correct? Do you really have to have everything
> duplicated (mirrored) to have data security or can you actually have a
> RAID
> type of setup (which is still extendable) under WHS?
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Harris [mailto:phil@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 30 November 2008 01:05
> > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
> >
> > Given all the discussion about WHS recently there's one thing I'd
like
> > to know - unfortunately the amount of data I'm playing with on my
> > server is a bit on the hefty side (about 14Tb at the moment) so I
don't
> > really want to have to start migrating all that data over to a
new
OS
> > just to try and see whether it works.
> >
> > What I would like to know is - if you have a "pool" of
storage (for
> > example my "Movies" collection) set up as a software
RAID5 array can
> > you still dynamically expand that array?
> >
> > Also, what happens if you shut down the server and physically
move
> > drives around so they're on different SATA connections? Is WHS
> > intelligent enough to work out that the data is still intact and
*NOT*
> > assume that the data needs to be rebuilt or the array has been
trashed?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Geoff H
> > > Sent: 28 November 2008 10:16
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
> > >
> > > Thanks for all of the responses. It looks like WHS seems to
be the
> > > preferred choice.
> > >
> > > I shall read the forums to see what experiences people have
had. I
> > have
> > > read some of the reviews on wegotserved and the Tranquil PC
systems
> > > come
> > > out well, so this is probably my preferred choice.
> > >
> > > Geoff
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ********************************************
> Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
> http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
> ********************************************
>
>
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1806 - Release Date:
22/11/2008
> 18:59

------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************