Re: NAS or WHS

["noughtomate" <balraj_jassal@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm a little on the fence with this.=20

The reason being, I've lost data in the past and have learned lessons=20
from it. My general 'Home Strategy' is, if I can read the data without=20
any additional system or software level management involved, then this=20
is better.=20

The 500GB of data I once lost on a Hard disk was a RAID Stripped=20
array. As a result, the data recovary cost doubled for me. (Something=20
like =A3600 vs. =A3300)

So my attitude is to keep data as simple as possible and know which=20
disk it is written to.=20

What does this have to do with NAS vs WHS ?

A NAS is a NAS. It does what is says on the tin and pretty much acts=20
as a good file server and occasionally can give you extras such as=20
Itunes servers, Download managers etc... Most NAS's are based on Linux=20
implmentations and are hackable to your own needs. If you're a Linux=20
wiz, a NAS should suit you well.=20

As I'm not a Linux Wiz, I use WHS but I do not use the Shared Folders=20
functionality.=20

Go to the Wegotserved forums and have a read on the Disk management=20
submissions. There are plenty of threads where people are concerned=20
about where their data is really stored. There are tools available to=20
find out the true disk a file is stored on, but the recovary process -=20
from what I've read - has not been straight forward and may be costly=20
if you expreience data loss.=20

So although I'm currently using WHS, I have created my own shared=20
folders as regular Server 2003 folders (as opposed to WHS pooled=20
drives), so I know I can pull out the disks and read them elsewhere.=20

If your requirement is to automate backups and make data available=20
around your house with SWIMBO friendliness and minimal administration,=20
then generally I'd say WHS is the way to go.=20

My personal recommendation is don't trust WHS backups Shared Pool back=20
ups and back up that data to another store where you know where the=20
data really sits.=20

Cheers,

Balraj

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Mark McCall" <lists@...> wrote:
>
> > WHS is so much better - not only a file server, but the way it=20
> > backs up PCs in the background is amazing=20
>=20
> I'd agree.  If you are a Windows household then go with WHS.
>=20
> M.
>



------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************=20=20