RE: Re: NAS or WHS

["Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why not trigger the scene using a group on the lighting application
rather
than the trigger application?

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gordon
> Sent: 30 November 2008 11:01
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
>
> Phil, quick CBUS question if I may... - I reckon I already know the
> answer, I just need a sanity check...
>
> Is it in any way possible to get an E2000 switch to trigger a scene
> stored in another unit? - I tried to reference a trigger group in the
> key assignment, but the unit only allows me to select from groups in
> the
> lighting application, - I'm thinking this is because the E2000 only
> supports one application at a time? - I already have other keys on the
> unit assigned to lighting groups...
>
> If my understanding is correct, the only way I could do it is if *all*
> the keys on the unit are added to groups in the trigger control
> application, - that, or do what I want in the PAC instead....
>
> Cheers.
>
> Paul G.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> Of
> > Phil Harris
> > Sent: 30 November 2008 01:18
> > To: 'Phil Harris'; UKHA Group
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
> >
> > Hmmm ... after a little more digging it seems that shares on WHS
can
> > either
> > be duplicated or not - seems that MS don't support
"RAID" like
> strategies
> > under WHS - is that correct? Do you really have to have
everything
> > duplicated (mirrored) to have data security or can you actually
have
> a
> > RAID
> > type of setup (which is still extendable) under WHS?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Phil Harris [mailto:phil@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 30 November 2008 01:05
> > > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
> > >
> > > Given all the discussion about WHS recently there's one
thing I'd
> like
> > > to know - unfortunately the amount of data I'm playing with
on my
> > > server is a bit on the hefty side (about 14Tb at the moment)
so I
> don't
> > > really want to have to start migrating all that data over to
a new
> OS
> > > just to try and see whether it works.
> > >
> > > What I would like to know is - if you have a
"pool" of storage (for
> > > example my "Movies" collection) set up as a
software RAID5 array
> can
> > > you still dynamically expand that array?
> > >
> > > Also, what happens if you shut down the server and
physically move
> > > drives around so they're on different SATA connections? Is
WHS
> > > intelligent enough to work out that the data is still intact
and
> *NOT*
> > > assume that the data needs to be rebuilt or the array has
been
> trashed?
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Geoff H
> > > > Sent: 28 November 2008 10:16
> > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: NAS or WHS
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all of the responses. It looks like WHS
seems to be
> the
> > > > preferred choice.
> > > >
> > > > I shall read the forums to see what experiences people
have had.
> I
> > > have
> > > > read some of the reviews on wegotserved and the
Tranquil PC
> systems
> > > > come
> > > > out well, so this is probably my preferred choice.
> > > >
> > > > Geoff
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > ********************************************
> > Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
> > http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
> > ********************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1806 - Release Date:
> 22/11/2008
> > 18:59
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ********************************************
> Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
> http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
> ********************************************
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3651 (20081129) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
database 3651 (20081129) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************