The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: Google Wave


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)


  • Subject: RE: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)
  • From: "Mark McCall" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:04:29 +0100

Yup, saw it the first time and meant to reply.

Looks interesting.

M.

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]=20
> On Behalf Of Ho Yin Ng
> Sent: 25 September 2006 14:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)
>=20
> Not sure if this went through the yahoo system - I didn't get my post.
>=20
> But apologies if it is a repost.
>=20
> Was at 100% design yesterday and saw this:
>=20
> http://www.diykyoto.com/
>=20
> It is a wireless device that sits anywhere at home and=20
> measures the amount of electricty you use and displays it constantly.
>=20
> A clip is attached the mains cable by your meter and this=20
> broadcasts the amount of energy you use to the Watson.
>=20
> The Watson can store up to 3 years of information on it and=20
> you can download this via USB on to your PC which can be=20
> graphically displayed via their beta program.
>=20
> Looks nice and interesting.
>=20
> I think it costs about =A3300 at the moment but they only have=20
> a limited edition. They hope to reduce the price to =A3150 when=20
> they get a proper production run. At the moment the device is=20
> hand made.
>=20
> If you are interest and contact them please let them know you=20
> heard it from Ho yin at Future Systems who was at 100% design.
>=20
> Ho yin
>=20
> no affiliation etc etc.
>=20
> On 25/09/06, David Gumbrell <david.gumbrell@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >   Useful comparison on Intel vs AMD from the perspective of power
> > consumption:
> >
> > http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/low_e/14.shtml
> >
> > I'm going to look even harder at AMD now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On 9/24/06, Andy Davies <dajdavies@xxxxxxx=20
> <dajdavies%40gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Just found this via Digg, which is equally scary...
> > >
> > > http://www.overclockers.com/articles1364/
> > >
> > > On 20/09/06, Mark McCall=20
> > > <lists@xxxxxxx<lists%40automatedhome.co.uk>
> > <lists%40automatedhome.co.uk>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Last night I was measuring the power usage of a little
NAS unit
> > compared
> > > > to
> > > > a PC and thought the info might be useful to some here.
The NAS=20
> > > > uses 18Watts and the PC almost 150Watts.
> > > >
> > > > Using this calculator...
> > > > http://www.ukpower.co.uk/running-costs-elec.asp
> > > > ..the annual 24/7 running costs for each work out as
follows
> > > >
> > > > NAS - =A317.38
> > > > PC - =A3144.80
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >=20=20
> >
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ** Sponsored by www.BERBLE.com **
> all the Cool Stuff, in one Place=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20




** Sponsored by www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place=20



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.