Re: VOIP FXS Gateways that support SIP

["Dan" <dtoma@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Andy,

In the X-Lite log I get:

SEND >> 192.246.69.223:5060
REGISTER sip:fwd.pulver.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.7.12.182:5080
From: <sip:21250@xxxxxxx:5080>
To: <sip:21250@xxxxxxx:5080>
Contact: "Dan Toma Home" <sip:21250@195.7.12.182:5080>
Call-ID: C0FC8F7151554869A7DC1491468CC30E@xxxxxxx
CSeq: 4504 REGISTER
Expires: 500
Content-Length: 0


RECEIVE << 192.246.69.223:5060
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.7.12.182:5080
From: <sip:21250@xxxxxxx:5080>
To: <sip:21250@xxxxxxx:5080>;tag=822a5132
Call-ID: C0FC8F7151554869A7DC1491468CC30E@xxxxxxx
CSeq: 4504 REGISTER
WWW-Authenticate: Digest
algorithm=MD5,nonce="1052584133",realm="192.246.69.223"
Content-Length: 0

As you can see, nothing about Q parameter....
More, if I want to register the same number on several devices, only the
last one registered works (ring)..


Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] VOIP FXS Gateways that support SIP


> Hi Dan,
>
> The Q values is the probability, or likelihood, thay a user can be
found
at this phone. The value has to be between 0.0 and 1.0 and is used by
proxies to call phones in the correct sequence (sequential and parallel
forking)
>
> As far as I can see with X-lite you cannot set this value at all. I
don;t
know about Cisco phones but would be suprised if you could not set it on
them. Have a look, they may call it probability or something like that.
IIRC
is there is no probability set when the phone registers then the default of
1.0 is used. As an example a registration when looking at a registrar would
look something like this:
>
>
<sip:computer@192.168.72.189:5060;line=2>;expires=2761;q=1.0;description=Ava
ilable
>
> HTH
>
> Andy
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>
> On 01/05/2003 at 14:37 Dan wrote:
>
> >Hi Andy,
> >
> >What is this Q number?
> >How can you set it in the soft phone... let's say X-Lite or in a
hardware
> >one (like Cisco 7960)?
> >I think I have missed something in between.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dan
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
> >To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 12:25 AM
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] VOIP FXS Gateways that support SIP
> >
> >
> >> Ian,
> >>
> >> Tis true, bleeding edge = high cost.... :(
> >>
> >> There are some really cool things you can do with sip though
that may
> >help
> >get it past the *ahem* Finance department...
> >>
> >> Since multiple sip phones can be registered with the same
address at
the
> >registrar you can have all the sip phones in the house ring when a
call
> >comes  in Setting the 'likelyhood of me being here' or Q value
means that
> >phones will ring in order of the likelyhood of  finding you..
eventually
> >all
> >phones will be ringing so you can pick up at any location - These
locations
> >can be metres, or kilometers apart. The plus point here can be
that you
can
> >have a sip phone in the bedroom with a Q value of 0.1 and it will
be the
> >last to ring, and thus less likely to disturb those sleeping in,
but
still
> >ringing just in case of emergencies... What's more with FXS/FXO
gateway
> >combinations added you can have the sip phones ring first by
setting
their
> >Q
> >values to 1, set one port on the gateway to a Q value of say 0.5
and it
> >point at your mobile, making it ring if the sip phones arent
answered.
> >>
> >> You could truely have a single number as your contact
point...that's
> >either uber kewl or just plain scary, depending on your point of
view...
> >>
> >> Regardless of whether you want to talk over the net to
people, SIP (and
> >other VOIP) phones allow for much more flexability than the
standard
phone,
> >plug them in where YOU like, not BT (et al).
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30/04/2003 at 20:17 Ian  Willoughby wrote:
> >>
> >> >The joy of being bleeding edge!
> >> >Asterix does look interesting, but possibly overkill for
such a humble
> >> >task. There on some OpenH323 solutions out there which
might do the
job,
> >> >once I have moved in I will start having a play, I still
have to get a
> >> >H.323 FXS gateway past the finance committee. I managed
to get the
PABX
> >> >past on the grounds that it could function as a baby
monitor, so maybe
> >> >the FXS gateway could be justified as a remote baby
monitor or to
check
> >> >on the babysitter hmmm ;-)
> >> >
> >> >Ian
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
> >http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
> >> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> >> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> >> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
> >http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
> >http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> >Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> >Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> >List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> ** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>