|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: Fast PCAnywhere equivalent |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT - DVD writers
pong!
Hi Mark!
> You're confusing different things here.
No, I got the concept. You've discussed 2 different systems. You've
put your case very clearly... From one of your posts..
> > > I was over-simplifying about
=
the archive usage - the HDD
is question is,
> > itself, backed up, to an
Applicati=
on Service Provider with
a full HSM
> backup
> > offering that does a full
delta-bl=
ock backup...
My point was Mark, that this one disk backup at work is not your only
backup of that data.
So I guess you don't trust 'just the one disk' system with anything
important. No, let me put that another way. I don't need to guess,
you've already told me you don't!
Now, my point is not budgets. My point is I wouldn't trust my work to
one backup on HD. I've done it. It failed.
I guess this is pong to your ping, but anyway, as I wrote, I can
accept your position is different to mine. Can you not accept
likewise?
J
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@e...>
wr=
ote:
> Jason,
>
> You're confusing different things here.
>
> The "backup being done by ISP" is a "got a large
corpor=
ate budget
solution at work".
>
> The "backup to another PC on the LAN" is my "home
solut=
ion."
>
> M.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Lee
[mailto:jasonjlee@n...]=
> Sent: Sun 07/07/2002 14:01
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD
writ=
ers
>
>
>
> Mark,
>
> If you read thru my post I said I
would=
n't trust *the backup*
to a single
> disk. As in, I have my hard disk, and
h=
ave a backup. That
backup should not
> be a single hd in my opinion.
>
> I gave calc's on cheapness but that
dep=
ends on how much your
backing up and
> when.
>
> I also gave the circumstances that,
doi=
ng exactly what you
suggested here, I
> lost 2 weeks work. It was bad luck,
but=
it happened.
>
> Also, if you trust this method so
much,=
why do you have
another backup being
> made by the ISP?
>
> So I think we can agree to disagree.
At=
least, I don't want
to ping-pong
> this all day. I've got x10 wiring to
le=
arn about!
>
> J
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Harrison"
<Mar=
k.Harrison@e...>
> To: <ukha_d@y...>
> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 1:08 PM
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT - DVD
writ=
ers
>
>
> > Jason,
> >
> > But you're not trusting it to a
si=
ngle HD.... you're making
a BACKUP on a
> different one... that's the point!
> >
> > I'm not disagreeing that
DVD-write=
rs have other benefits,
but if all
> you're looking for is a backup, then
th=
ey aren't the cheapest
solution.
> >
> > The point about a backup is that
i=
t's an EXTRA copy... so
you don't have a
> single point of failure anywhere.
> >
> > M.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Lee
[mailto:jasonjlee@=
n...]
> > Sent: Sun 07/07/2002 00:32
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT -
DVD=
writers
> >
> >
> >
> > To me, anything that is important
=
enough to not lose, I
wouldn't trust the
> > backup to a single hd.
> >
> > They fail.
> >
> > As they did when *TWO* 75Gig Ibms
=
died without warning,
taking 2 weeks of
> > coding with it. (I was lucky I
had=
been backing up to the
dvd-ram before
> > then). As your in IT I think you
w=
ill know the drives I am
referring too.
> I
> > had them just after launch when
th=
e great reviews were
around, before the
> > faulty units started to appear.
If=
I remember correctly it
was something
> to
> > do with when they bought the
Hunga=
ry factory online. I
don't make the same
> > mistake twice, so I won't trust
HD=
for backups again.
> >
> > Now HD space cheaper than
dvd-r?
> >
> > 89p for 4.3g DVD-RW
> > Say 10 disks.. =C2=A38.90.
43gig..=
> > Now you have to factor in the
cost=
of the dvd-r etc,etc,
but as I said
> > before dvd writers have side
benef=
its.
> > (But then in your example you
fact=
or in the pc which you
costed at =C2=A3200.)
> >
> > And you have to manage the media,
=
but thats not too bad.
> >
> > What I'm after is an affordable
DV=
D autoloader. If Yamaha
Japan would just
> > reply to my emails..
> >
> > Anyway, I think we can agree to
di=
sagree. To each his own.
> >
> > J
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Harrison"
&l=
t;Mark.Harrison@e...>
> > To: <ukha_d@y...>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002
8:02=
PM
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT -
DVD=
writers
> >
> >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > As I said - "if your
req=
uirement is simply _backup_".
> > >
> > > I _am_ prepared to put
_backu=
ps_ on a non-RAID HDD...
because _backup_
> > means "spare copy".
> > >
> > > I was over-simplifying about
=
the archive usage - the HDD
is question is,
> > itself, backed up, to an
Applicati=
on Service Provider with
a full HSM
> backup
> > offering that does a full
delta-bl=
ock backup... I'm
guessing, however,
> that
> > this would be out of Ray's price
r=
ange if he's talking
about buying a
> > DVD-writer :-)
> > >
> > > The point was that hard disk
=
space is, now, rather
cheaper than tape, or
> > blank optical media... so if the
s=
olution really is a
_backup_, a copy to
> > another PC is actually the
cheapes=
t way to go. I know that
a number of
> > people on this group use
_removabl=
e_ IDE drives for this
purpose...
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > From: Jason Lee
[mailto:jason=
jlee@n...]
> > > Sent: Sat 06/07/2002
11:49
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Cc:
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: OT
=
- DVD writers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Um, I would have said the
sam=
e thing before I experienced
IBM hard
> drives
> > a
> > > while ago.
> > >
> > > As a cheap solution, yeah
may=
be. But Hard Disks fail..
> > >
> > > I bet you don't put any data
=
"you" couldn't live without on
that system at
> > > work, unless its raided?
> > >
> > > Plus having a dvdwriter has
s=
ide benefits.
> > >
> > > The 'which disk is that on'
I=
am working on.. Once I've
got the projects
> > > I've already started
finished=
!
> > >
> > > oh and double sided disks
are=
around for dvd-r.. not sure
of the quality
> > > though.
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message
-----<=
BR>
> > > From:
"mark_harrison_uk1=
" <Mark.Harrison@e...>
> > > To: <ukha_d@y...>
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 06,
2002=
11:43 AM
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: OT -
DV=
D writers
> > >
> > >
> > > Ray,
> > >
> > > If you requirement is simply
=
backup for that kind of data
volume,
> > > there's a more
cost-effective=
, and fast solution than
either you
> > > propose.
> > >
> > > A second PC (second-hand, a
P=
2 would be fine), with a,
say, 60Gb HDD
> > > in it, a couple of network
ca=
rds and a crossover cable -
and lo, your
> > > ideal backup solution for
abo=
ut =C2=A3200.
> > >
> > > It's what I do at home for
ba=
ckup... it's also what we
now do at work
> > > for long-term archiving of
th=
e digital images for the
comet website!
> > > The cost equation of
hardware=
was about the same, but
once you took
> > > into account the indexing
pro=
blem (which CD is that photo
on)... it
> > > became an obvious thing to
do=
.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In ukha_d@y...,
"Ray=
Barnett" <lists@t...> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Just wanted a quick bit
=
of advice since I gather some
people here
> > > use them a
> > > > fair bit...
> > > >
> > > > I urgently need to
imple=
ment a backup system capable of
looking
> > > after my
> > > > rapidly growing 20GBs
of=
digital photos.
> > > >
> > > > Current favourites are
a=
DVD writer or an Onstream 60GB
tape thingy.
> > > > However, I've just
confu=
sed myself over the
compatibilities of the
> > > various
> > > > DVD writers. Just how
co=
mpatible is a DVD-R writer, and
is it a
> > > dead duck
> > > > now that DVD+R is
gettin=
g more popular?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Ray Barnett.
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subsc=
ribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-uns=
ubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner:
ukha_d-owne=
r@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
=
subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subsc=
ribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-uns=
ubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner:
ukha_d-owne=
r@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
=
subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
__
> > > This email has been scanned
f=
or all viruses by the
MessageLabs SkyScan
> > > service. For more
information=
on a proactive anti-virus
service working
> > > around the clock, around the
=
globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
> > >
______________________________________________________________________
__
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@=
y...
> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscr=
ibe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@y..=
.
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subje=
ct to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te=
rms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
______________________________________________________________________
__
> > This email has been scanned for
al=
l viruses by the
MessageLabs SkyScan
> > service. For more information on
a=
proactive anti-virus
service working
> > around the clock, around the
globe=
, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
> >
______________________________________________________________________
__
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
=
Sponsor ---------------
------~-->
> Free $5 Love Reading
> Risk Free!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pp91HA/PfREAA/Ey.GA=
A/IBOolB/TM
>
---------------------------------------=
-----------------------
-------~->
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@y...<=
BR>
> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@y=
...
> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to=
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/te=
rms/
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________=
__________________
__________
> This email has been scanned for all
vir=
uses by the
MessageLabs SkyScan
> service. For more information on a
proa=
ctive anti-virus
service working
> around the clock, around the globe,
vis=
it
http://www.messagelabs.com
>
____________________________________________=
__________________
__________
Yahoo! Groups
Spons=
or |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www=
.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|