The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: [Slightly OT] Intel CPU


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Napco Gemini 3200



I'll probably get the panel / keypad / battery next week and get the rest
next month. That will give me a month to play with it on the bench, before
i
need to decide what extras i need.

thanks for the help guys :-)
Neil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Napco Gemini 3200


> > OK I'm convinced :-)
>
> Hurrah! :-)
>
> > Mark, you say you wouldn't recommend buying without the serial
link.
What
> > would the serial link do for me apart from presumably giving me a
nice
GUI
> > for programming? (maybe enough a reason to get it anyway). I
don't see
> much
> > need for the web interface when i have homeseer's.
>
> The UCM will allow you to use the CS-Xpres software to programme the
panel.
> It's also needed for ACE to send and receive info to Comfort.  If
you've
got
> more of a programmers mind than me and no need for ACE then you could
do
> without it.
>
> > I'm quite confused on the bits i need to get me going...
> > comfort panel
> > 2 keypads (for now)
> > doorphone
> > ringer module
>
> Sounds good.  One of the beauties of the system are its expandability.
You
> can add more zones, relays etc later on.
>
> > the bits that a troubling me are cs-xpress / ucmdev / ucm01
??!...
>
> As above you can prob do without these in the meantime Neil.
>
> Now..all you need to do is convince Mike to make the Comfort panel the
next
> of his daily specials! :-)
>
> Regards
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.