Re: (Mark ?)

[geraint@xxxxxxx]

Snide comments ? I didn't think anything in there was snide, I
thought it was quite direct to the point.

I don't want this to go on any longer, so as I do have the
intelligence (whilst not a genius on your level), I think it unwise
to waste more time on someone with an IQ in single figures.

If you want to continue your slagging off of me by direct e-mail,
feel free, I know exactly where the delete key is placed !

Regards
Geraint (standing up for the non-genius members amongst us)

--- In ukha_d@y..., "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@i...>
wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: geraint@a... [mailto:geraint@xxxxxxx...]
> > Sent: 05 August 2001 23:25
> > To: ukha_d@y...
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: (Mark ?)
> >
> >
> > Suits me just fine !
> >
> > I know a good optician, if you are unable to read mail becuase it
has
> > extra commas in it. (of course, thats if you bother to read it !)
> >
> > I'm going to bite my tongue with what I would really like to say.
>
> So am I.
>
> >
> > Quite sad that you have nothing better to do than check on
gramatical
> > errors in e-mail.
> > I would have thought the content of mail would be more important,
but
> > I guess not.
> >
>
> I really couldn't give a fuck about your grammar, if I did, then I
would
> never be able to read any public forum on the Internet, all I ask
is that
> you make your posts easier to read.
>
> > But of course I don't object to opinion, even ones as extreme as
this.
> > It's a shame that the only times I see mail from you is when it
is
> > critical about someone else's findings or ideas, especially when
they
> > do not follow your own interpretations.
>
> Really? After Alan tried what I suggested I posted a follow-up.
Firstly I
> made some suggestions about repeating the test with slightly
different
> equipment, and secondly I admitted that maybe I was wrong the first
time,
> and that I would repeat the same test again at a later time. In
fact I'm
> going to get hold of an HF-8, which is very highly regarded, and
get Phil
> Harris to come round, and with a bit of luck the cable supplier
too. I've
> been a member of this list for several years now, and have done
more than my
> fair share of helping.
>
> >
> > This group has been more than friendly and on many occasions
people
> > on here have got me a fix to a problem very quickly.
> > It's a shame you cannot therefore participate in the spirit of
what
> > these groups are about instead of putting someone down.
>
> I can. All I did was ask that you make your posts easier to read,
and you
> responded further down the thread with snide comments - which
always seems
> to be the way when people who are too lazy to write reasonably
formatted
> English are criticised. I realise that not everyone is a genius
when it
> comes to English, but it isn't that difficult to take just a little
more
> care over what you write to make it easier for others to read.
>
> >
> > I apologise now to the group if they don't like me using multiple
> > commas, fullstops, spelling or any other gramatical errors, but I
do
> > have better things to do then check my typing when asking a quick
> > question or just replying to such like.
> >
> But you're obviously not too busy to make snide comments. All I did
was ask
> you to lay off on the commas.
>
> Tim.