[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT: W2k ICS vs. Linux masquerading
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT: W2k ICS vs. Linux masquerading
- From: "Timothy Morris" <mail@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:15:36 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark@xxxxxxx] Sent: 10 November
2000 12:13 To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: W2k ICS vs.
Linux masquerading
Sorry Stuart, but I disagree. This wasn't my
first
time by any means:
I've installed, over the past couple of
years:
- Windows 98 about 30 times - Windows NT about 15
times -
Windows 2000 about once :-)
I've been testing some beta
R/C
helicopter software. SP1 revealed a hardware bug in the PCI to ISA bridge
on my
hardware. While tracking down the problem in conjunction with the developer
based in Oregon (GMT -8, lots of late nights), I've re-installed w2k 6
times in
the past 2 days. Once you set up an un-attended installation, it is REALLY
easy.
You probably know this Mark, but for those that don't, the Windows 2000
Resource
kit (BIG book plus CD full of tools) is a must have for all us
'pointy-heads'
Tim
eGroups
Sponsor |
|
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|