[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: XPS3 Strangeness
Robert Green wrote:
> I find that once you have a marginal area where one phase doesn't reach
> another, it's only a matter of time before that area spreads and others
> appear. It may be a cell phone charger, a new laptop, a CFL bulb or some
> other demon, but eventually, you'll plug something in that kills the X-10
> signal. It always seems to happen when you're short of time to chase down
> the problem, too. The stock X-10 five to ten volt signal is just not enough
> "oomph" to power through the clogged electrical "streets" of a modern house
> anymore.
>
> I chased my tail for years doing exactly what you're doing - finding
> connection paths that seem to work for a while. I had a good excuse though,
> because Jeff had not yet created the XTB-IIR. My experience is that X-10
> now works as well as it did in the early 80's when there were few or no
> switch mode power supplies in general use.
>
> Sorry to sound as strident as a reformed smoker looking for converts, but I
> wasted a lot of time and money trying to keep one step ahead of the X-10
> demons before I installed the XTB and killed them all. Very high SAF, too,
> once the installation was complete.
>
> I understand the price issue, though. Only you can make the final call
> about how much system reliability is worth. For me, it was falling down the
> stairs when a motion controlled X-10 light went on and then off as I was
> descending very quickly. I had been using multiple transceivers on
> alternate phases to compensate for lack of even a passive coupler but that
> turned out to be an extraordinarily bad workaround.
>
> I've always felt the need to futz with the main breaker panel to achieve
> maximum performance was a real inhibition to HA growth (which was mainly
> X-10) for the last 20 years. I hope Z-wave and some other protocols truly
> kill the panel beast.
>
> I'm not sure what I would do at your stage. Obviously I didn't do what I am
> preaching now and have a nearly $300 power line signal analyzer to prove it!
> (-: I kept avoiding the circuit box solution for a variety of reasons, the
> lack of an XTB-IIR among them. It sounds like it would be pretty easy for
> you to adapt to a pattern that works - for now. But from what we've seen
> here, if you see problems now, they'll only get worse, not better without
> some sort of coupler/repeater.
>
> --
> Bobby G.
>
>
>
Thanks Bobby, I know you are right. I will contact Jeff once he is back.
David
comp.home.automation Main Index |
comp.home.automation Thread Index |
comp.home.automation Home |
Archives Home