Re: Time for HA, finally. Thinking Insteon. Mulling this for 20 years. What is best?

[Marc_F_Hult <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Got it.

I asked in part because it seems that you are well satisfied with the X-10
(protocol) installation using INSTEON hardware. One of the primary,
long-standing complaints about X-10 has been the poor tactile feel of the
X10 (brand) and most other (eg Leviton) X-10 hardware. Years ago I spent $$
on a few expensive non-X10 X-10 switches that also disappointed in one way
or another including touch and feel.

After living with 15 or so INSTEON ICON (the inexpensive ones) dimmer
switches for a few months, I've concluded that they are 'good enough" to
serve as primary switches even if they weren't used in HA with a
controller. In other words, they would not need to ripped out on sale of
the house, and don't irritate the SO, or confound Grandma.

Being able to dependably control them with either protocol (X-10 or
INSTEON) is -- from that most basic, practical homeowner perspective --
effectively an 'optional extra'. Which option you take becomes less
important because the most important consideration (the infrastructure
equivalent of "do no harm") is satisfied.

Mis dos limpuras ... Marc
Marc_F_Hult
www.ECOntrol.org


On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:01:39 -1000, "BruceR" <razrbruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message  <459d8753$0$7701$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>I'm using most of the Insteons in X10 mode until the RoZetta is ready.
>The problem is that I have everything programmed in my Stargate and
>there is no Insteon equivalent to the Stargate. Alas, Stargate only
>sends X10 so I need to translate the X10 signals to Insteon.  The
>Insteon translator that I got as a beta is frozen in some unknown mode
>and has lost about half of the programmed translations.  Once I have the
>RoZetta installed (soon!) I will be able to pretty much eleiminate X10
>signaling entirely.
>
>  At that point the XTB II will most likely move to my Houston home
>which will continue to use X10. I will, however, use XTB I units to
>amplify signals from X10 controllers that I still may need.
>
> Marc_F_Hult wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:33:31 -1000, "BruceR"
>> <razrbruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> <459d649d$0$8958$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Jeff, Right you are about X10 reliability falling off as more Insteon
>>> devices are installed but you, sir, have solved that problem (at
>>> least for me) with your XTB II product.  I have about 60 Insteon
>>> devices right now and untill installing the XTB II the X10 signals
>>> were almost worthless evem with an ACT repeater.  Now, with the XTB
>>> II installed at a panel and in TW523 emulation mode, I have no X10
>>> problems at all!
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> Please refresh my memory. Why is it that you use INSTEON in the X-10
>> compatibility mode rather than natively?
>>
>> The native mode has numerous capabilities that (at least) legacy X-10
>> does not including signal repeating, the ability to 'discover'
>> INSTEON devices, give them names/descriptors ("bathroom mirror
>> light") and download them to the devices for future reference,
>> determine device type and revision number, and so on.
>>
>> Are these capabilities also available in the X-10 compatibility mode?
>>
>> TIA ... Marc
>> Marc_F_Hult
>> www.ECOntrol.org
>