Re: Water heater eating X-10 signal

[lnh <lnoh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <1338677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 ddl@danlan.*com (Dan Lanciani) wrote:

> In article <E9ydnWRPweMgFqnbnZ2dnUVZ_rWnnZ2d@xxxxxxx>,
> ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx (Robert Green) writes:
>
>
> | Dan points out that might not be the case as he's seen wall switches suffer
> | from interference that did not register on the ESM1 so without a scope or
> | analyzer, it's very hard to say for sure.
>

> And in fact it was pretty hard to see even on a scope.  Those switches
> seem to be among the most sensitive X10 receivers.

So what is the best way to see the noise on a scope?

Hook the scope to an X10 bridge to filter the 60Hz and make the X10
signal and noise easier to see?

It would be hard to see the noise riding on a 120V signal without
blowing out the input on the scope.