[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!

Subject: Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
From: AZ Nomad <aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:50:35 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <AJudnXpxSpn3y-fZRVn-tw@xxxxxxx> <slrne81vfd.26e.aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <pw7gg.9848$9W5.2151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrne89trb.ipk.aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4q6dnRzLktQK4xjZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@xxxxxxx>

On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:07:44 -0400, Robert Green <ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


>"AZ Nomad" <aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

>On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 03:40:05 GMT, BruceR >

>>> While higher bandwidth is always welcome for broadband
>>> connections, the X10 technology's problem has never really
>>> been one of speed but of reliability and resistance to
>>> interference from other PLC signal
>>
>> OH pulleze.  If you 60 baud is nowhere enough bandwidth.

>If me, 60 BPS plenty good bandwidth!  (-:  (Baud ain't the right term, BTW,
>it's bits per second)

baud is signal changes per second and with X10, 60 baud == 60 bps.  Of course
there's overhead for start/stop bits, parity, etc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
  - From: Robert Green

References:
- Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
  - From: AZ Nomad
- Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
  - From: BruceR
- Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
  - From: AZ Nomad
- Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
  - From: Robert Green

Prev by Message: Re: Mini-ITX PC's a the future of HA (was Re: X-10 Mister House Motion sensor problems)
Next by Message: Re: Rhino 3000
Previous by thread: Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
Next by thread: Re: XTB - the Future of X10 has arrived!
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home