[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10/Insteon

Subject: Re: X10/Insteon
From: Neil Cherry <njc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:02:36 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <GZaDf.52575$tK4.6944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138574492_6122@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43dd699a.853559734@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43dd81ba.859736046@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138606917_7188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43ddf48a.889126812@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:42:42 GMT, Dave Houston wrote:
> "none" <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> One RF Linc per phase should work. The Insteon packets are 1823µS duration
>>> so three at 120° intervals or 5556µS apart will not overlap even if there
>>> is incidental coupling over the wiring.
>>
>>Smarthome states that Insteon is not 3-phase compatible.
>>
>>http://smarthome.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/smarthome.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1178
>
> So who are you going to believe - me or the people who invented it?

Dave you do realize that is the URL were X10's and you ask that
question it would be retorical. ;-)

--
Linux Home Automation         Neil Cherry       ncherry@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxha.com/                         Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/                    My HA Blog
http://home.comcast.net/~ncherry/               Backup site

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: Neil Cherry

References:
- X10/Insteon
  - From: Chris
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: none
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: none
- Re: X10/Insteon
  - From: Dave Houston

Prev by Message: Re: Trash-Bot
Next by Message: re:Smarthome Insteon Translator
Previous by thread: Re: X10/Insteon
Next by thread: Re: X10/Insteon
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home