[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!

Subject: Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
From: "Jeff Volp" <JeffVolp@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 06:04:37 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <xFhfh.471684$QZ1.157389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6e5gh.30252$wP1.27181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <qtdgh.203122$Fi1.110592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8ehgh.491908$QZ1.430735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4582b919.115898375@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <l3lgh.205093$Fi1.57947@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4581ede7.129416375@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Dave Houston" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4581ede7.129416375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Most of them dismiss the inductance of the wire itself. They mostly felt
the
> inductance of the terminations and the capacitance of various loads were
the
> important factors.

I found that report again:

http://www.passlabs.com/downloads/articles/spkrcabl.pdf

Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Dave Houston

References:
- X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Jeff Volp
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Alan Vogel
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Jeff Volp
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Jeff Volp
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Jeff Volp
- Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
  - From: Dave Houston

Prev by Message: Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
Next by Message: Re: X10 and Linux
Previous by thread: Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
Next by thread: Re: X10 signals can be TOO strong!
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home