Re: The MM & Jiminex show (was: Bass...)

["BruceR" <brNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Frank, I thought you promised to stop cross-posting this stuff to
CHA!?

From:Frank Olson
feolson@xxxxxxxxxx

> "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:y_KdnSkAgs-CZubfRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> If someone in CHA were to go real life...
>>
>> What this fellow deliberately fails to mention is that I called
>> *after* the perpetrator (another of the same "ASA" folks who has
>> posted tons of useless trash in these newsgroups) posted my soc sec
>> number in the newsgroup.  It appeared that he may have run an
>> illegal credit check, in addition to this outrageous act of
>> harassment.
>
> Graham *told* you where he obtained the information from.  He
> obtained a copy of your criminal record.  Are you denying his calling
> you to tell you this??  Why do you choose to lie *again*??  All of
> this came out the last time you brought the subject up as well as
> when it first happened.  You even *admitted* that's the way it
> happened but decided Graham needed "payback".
>
>> IMO that contstituted a RT attack and necessitated a response.
>
> IMO that's pure horse-twaddle.
>
>
>> It remains a question whether he did in fact run an illegal credit
>> check using his employer's access.
>
> Graham's employer at the time all this happened didn't run credit
> checks on customers and had no account with a credit reporting
> agency.  The gentleman you were talking to there most likely told you
> this, but all this aside, you *know* this to be the truth and you're
> now "fudging" the facts.  That's pretty "low" in my book, Robert.
>
>
>> He denies it but he's been caught lying hundreds of times.
>
> "Hundreds of times"??  Name one.
>
>> His boss' reply was an apology that "his problem" (G. Morgan) had
>> apparently also become mine.
>
> Graham did mention this part of his boss' response, but I don't think
> it means what you're inferring.
>
>
>>
>> Jiminex, in his haste to attack, deliberately ignores this and the
>> repeated personal attacks, noth online and real life, which another
>> of his friends, one Michael Sabodish (the fellow who pretends to be
>> a "Group Moderator") has perpetrated.  This individual has gone
>> after my sister, my neighbnors, my children, my elderly parents and
>> their neighbors.  He has made a six- or seven-year carreer of
>> harassing me.
>
> There's no excuse for what Mike's done.  But then, there's no excuse
> for the attacks you've initiated on individuals in other newsgroups.
>
>
>>
>> Sabodish, several other competitors from this newsgroup and their
>> friends have filed false complaints with the Florida and Connecticut
>> licensing authorities.  These were each dismissed when the
>> investigators from each state found no merit in the complaints.
>> Sabodish has also created a hate website dedicated to his
>> cyber-stalking efforts.  The website was repeatedly taken down when
>> his various ISPs saw nazi insignia and other such filth on his
>> pages.  The current iteration is apparently somewhat sanitized but
>> it still contains stolen artwork, some of which belongs to me and
>> some to manufacturers in my industry.
>
> Heh...  I wonder if the folks at Disney know what Mike's doing with
> one of their "icons"...  I understand they pursue unauthorized use of
> their Trademarks and Property vigorously.
>
>
>>
>> None of these things are ever mentioned by Jiminex in his
>> oft-repeated, vulgar tirades and threats to destroy any newsgroup
>> where I participate should the members of that newsgroup fail to
>> comply with his demands.
>
> True...  But then you don't mention all the bad things you've done
> either. In fact, you've done a lot of things I'm sure you'd prefer to
> "take back".
>
>> All of the above is documented and provable.  Unfortunately, the
>> people who did these things are mostly indigent, blue collar
>> installers without sufficient assets to merit a lawsuit.
>
> "Indigent"??
>
>
>>
>> Add to this vile behavior the fact that these individuals provide
>> almost nothing of value to any of the newsgroups they have attempted
>> to destroy. For my part, I don't deny having a bit of a temper. There
>> are times when I've posted some rather stinging retorts, but
>> nothing like what these belligerant bullies have done.
>
> You sure about that??  :-))