Re: Insteon?

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)]

I took a look before my first post. There's no useful information there let
alone any details about how Insteon works.

"md" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Actually the site Dan mentioned was written by a guy that saw Insteon and
>talked directly with SmartHome reps at some show (the name escapes me now, I
>want to say CES but I don't remember for sure). It has much more details
>than the "same regurgitated SmartHome press release" you mention. Take a
>look! It's quite informative.
>
>Matt
>
>"Dave Houston" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:4230ec0c.76418176@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Dan <haguru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >Dave Houston wrote:
>> >> Has anybody seen any detailed technical specifications for Insteon?
>> >>
>> >> All of the initial hype made it sound like each device was capable of
>> >> receiving RF (perhaps I misread that) but what little recent info I've
>found
>> >> sounds suspiciously like it consists of two RF2PLC devices (i.e. one
>> >> RR501-like device for each phase) with PLC communication to switches,
>lamp
>> >> and appliance modules.
>> >>
>> >> The initial press releases indicated it would be available 1Q05 but now
>it
>> >> has slipped to 2Q05.
>> >>
>> >Check out this introduction guide to Insteon:
>> >http://www.cocoontech.com/index.php?showtopic=1233
>> >
>> >probably contains the most info you can find on the internet.
>>
>> I can find the same regurgitated SmartHome press release at dozens of
>places
>> on the web.
>>
>>      http://www.techliving.com/article/159.html
>>      http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA496933.html
>>
>>
>http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA424448?industryid=21376&industry=Wireless
>>
>>
>