Re: Insteon Test Report

["BruceR" <br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, I did that - sorry I wasn't more clear about that. I tried
dim/bright, off/on and address buttons from a maxi-controller. All of
them jammed the Insteon signal if held down.  However, that doesn't
concern me too much as the more likely scenario would be a single X10
code conflicting in which case Insteon will try again.  This weekend I
will swap some X10 modules that only work when a filter is present on a
nearby TV and see if Insteon performs well without the filters in place.

From:The Alien
Someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> X-No-archive: yes On 29 Dec 2005 08:09:17 GMT, *com (Dan Lanciani)
> used recycled pixels to say:
>
>> In article <C6Hsf.8311$ka.7161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (BruceR) writes:
>>> Of course, I was so frustrated by the other stuff that I forgot to
>>> do that test.  Here are the results:
>>>  I plugged one Insteon Appliance Module, one Insteon Tabletop
>>> Controller, one Leviton X10 Signal Generator and one ELK ESM1 into a
>>> basic powerstrip.  The Insteon module responded flawlessly to every
>>> on and off command sent from the controller and the ESM1 did indeed
>>> report it as noise by turning off the green light about 2 seconds
>>> after the Insteon signal was sent.  I then plugged the controller
>>> into various outlets around the house and it worked fine (except
>>> ,of course, from the infamous bathroom).
>>
>> Could you repeat this test but substituting a standard X10 mini or
>> maxi
>> controller with the DIM or BRI button wedged on for the Leviton
>> signal
>> generator?
>>
>> Dan Lanciani
>
> Bruce, any chance to try the DIM or BRIGHT as requested here?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Autobot This Spammers!
> <A HREF="mailto:postmaster@[127.0.0.1]";></A>
> mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> (to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
> and after sirname.