Re: ADI - Policy of Bad Behavior

["Bob La Londe" <none@xxxxxxxxxx>]

<jay@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c4bms85i9h4fe39req3l5602fmngodidcd@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:13:12 -0700, "Bob La Londe" <none@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>I just received a call from somebody with ADI corporate, and we had a bit
>>of
>>a verbal scuffle.  When I told them what they said they said that was not
>>what they said, and then informed me that they were recording all the
>>calls,
>>and they would play it back to me.
>
>>.....
>>
>>Did that sink in yet?  It took me a minute too.  They are recording
>>telephone conversations without notifying you in advance or playing a
>>recording notification tone.  I'm pretty sure that is illegal.  Ok, more
>>than pretty sure.  Either the person on the other end is in the habit of
>>lying to customers routinely, or ADI has a corporate policy of illegal
>>behavior.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Bob La Londe
>>
>>The Security Consultant
>>PO Box 5720
>>Yuma, Az 85366
>>
>
> It's not illegal in AZ.
>
> http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/arizona-recording-law
>
> Arizona Wiretapping Law
>
> Arizona's wiretapping law is a "one-party consent" law. Arizona makes
> it a crime to intercept a "wire or electronic communication" or a
> "conversation or discussion" unless you are a party to the
> communication, present during the conversation or discussion, or one
> party to the communication or conversation consents. A.R.S. § 13-3005,
> -3012(9). Therefore, if you operate in Arizona, you may record a
> conversation or phone call if you are a party to the conversation or
> you get permission from one party to the conversation in advance. That
> said, if you intend to record conversations involving people located
> in more than one state, you should abide by the recording law of the
> most restrictive state involved, or play it safe and get the consent
> of all parties.

Wow!  Looks like I was wrong.  Federal law is one party consent also.  Well,
ADI still sucks.