Re: What the future holds for ASA

[Frank Kurz <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/29/2012 7:05 AM, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:43:55 AM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
>> spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Simple. Why start a NEW thread on a subject ALREADY being discussed HERE? And is it really advertising when it is DEAD ON TOPIC?
>>
>>
>>
>> It *was* being discussed over a year ago.  It was flatly rejected.
>
> And now it's being discussed again, same subject, no need for a new thread (do you not understand how this whole thread thing works?) I don't actually see where it was "flatly rejected" either.
>
> http://www.integratedsecurityprofessionals.com/
>

It's been tried a number of times.  The hardliners here like the
unmoderated format.

--
Fire Protection Technicians Network
www.firetechs.net