[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: What the future holds for ASA

Subject: Re: What the future holds for ASA
From: spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <c761a74f-f5a2-4941-9d6a-a40bfa609d5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <66789138-d8a8-4c1b-950d-dcc23521af2b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fd9ae855-e01c-474c-8790-af1103ed1253@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <252a4643-d9c1-4336-8e47-6fd5db789be7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c0e9812d-8bb9-421e-952f-0428b8ea83c4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2u1td8lkmtmu0tcvs4ll4vlcut3ciubfkk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b6bb2921-2754-4a49-8fb5-7590ad76ead7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ub0ud8d3fqbaosmspo9t2rp0p4qbcp4h4v@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:43:55 AM UTC-5, G. Morgan wrote:
> spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Wrote:
>
>
>
> >Simple. Why start a NEW thread on a subject ALREADY being discussed HERE? And is it really advertising when it is DEAD ON TOPIC?
>
>
>
> It *was* being discussed over a year ago.  It was flatly rejected.

And now it's being discussed again, same subject, no need for a new thread (do you not understand how this whole thread thing works?) I don't actually see where it was "flatly rejected" either.

http://www.integratedsecurityprofessionals.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: Frank Kurz
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: G . Morgan

References:
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: spam
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: spam
- Re: What the future holds for ASA
  - From: G . Morgan

Prev by Message: Re: U T C sell fire and security branch
Next by Message: Re: What the future holds for ASA
Previous by thread: Re: What the future holds for ASA
Next by thread: Re: What the future holds for ASA
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home