Re: Industry Members Only Sub-Forum

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Apr 30, 1:34=A0am, Spellcheck Patrol <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 8:48=A0pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Spellcheck Patrol Wrote:
>
> > >I do wish you the very best of luck with your new endeavor.
>
> > >Cordially,
>
> > >If you posted here you'd know my name without having to do a search on
> > >me
>
> > Aren't you supposed to end that with "Thread Closed" ? <
>
> Mark my words.
> This thread will continue for quite some time, be it in the public
> forum, or amongst those he may email, as the OP needs the thread to
> appear significant amongst the internet community.
>
> Funny how he has had more to say in the last 4 weeks on this one topic
> than he has had to say in the last 12 years on all other topics
> combined.
>
> Don't be too shocked if he doesn't open an online store in the near
> future.
>
> This is all about feeding an ego.
>
> I'd be willing to wager if I ran analytics of recent visitors on my
> sites I'd find an IP address belonging to his company.
>
> I actually do have security forums for some of my sites yet after a
> few moments of thought I realized it was a waste of time creating them
> when the public forum is far more entertaining.
>
> Imagine how boring this place would be if it had a moderator.
> No Paul, ThelmaSue, Cowboy Chip, Marc Antony, UFOBOSS, Clueless, Larry
> Laffer, Goofy's Place, The Testimony, 30,000 long winded gun rights
> posts from a certain old man in Canada that never curses, pictures of
> Mark in gay biker shorts, recumbent bikes, inverted airplanes, cross
> posts to that group of home automation weirdos, and on and on and on.
>
> Thank you no, this place is absolutely perfect as is.

Don't forget about the cereal box caper.