Re: Seeking input

["ABLE1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3bKdnceJ0Ma8sA3RnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "ABLE1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:LnAjo.152122$iV7.43541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a customer that has a 16 zone hardwired system and wants to
>> upgrade.
>>
>> That is not the problem.  In his upgrade he want a system that is "Web
>> Based" so he can control on line.
>>
>> "Web Based" is his term.  His primary goal is to have the ability to arm
>> and disarm the system and secondary to bypass, change codes, basically
>> all the things you can from the keypad.
>>
>> I have just started my investigation so I was wondering what input I can
>> pick up from here.
>>
>> Thanks much for all the input I am about to receive.
>>
>> Les
>>
> I'm not trying to be a jerk, but the industry has enough False Alarms
> caused by people onsite in front of their keypads, not to mention all of
> these "Gadget People" that want to fart around with their alarms over the
> internet... Sounds like more crap that's going to cause more problems... I
> lock my house up and turn the alarm on before I leave the Freaking
> house... I guess I'm just too old and set in my ways for my own
> good...........

I can agree with that, but some people do like their toys.  I have at least
one customer that had a system installed just so that they can say they have
one.  I doubt that they have armed their system in years.
As for the false alarms, it is what it is.

Les