Re: Alarm Farce...

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On May 18, 2:00=A0am, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On May 17, 8:10=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 17, 7:28=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > On May 16, 12:13=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > RHC: Unfortunately, you and I discussing something like this we bot=
h
> > > > totally agree on is like the "minister preaching to the converted".
> > > > The really sad part is how unsophisticated consumers are taken in b=
y
> > > > all the phoney marketing hype.
>
> > > > At least when you have taken no security precautions, you know it a=
nd
> > > > can accommodate to a degree for it. However, when you are sold =A0c=
rap
> > > > and lead to believe you have a real measure of security, you end up
> > > > fooling yourself with a false sense of security. That's really sad.=
....
>
> > > That's awful harsh Robert, you'd think they were ADT or something...
>
> > RHC: ADT are saints compared to Alarm Force. ADT is a legitimate
> > company, and basically a good one (on the commercial and large
> > government side anyway), but Alarm Force....well....wait until they
> > come south and then tell me you don't agree....:))
>
> Not that I know much about the actual system but can you tell me any
> instance where one of their installations failed during a real
> burglary?

RHC: That's not the issue here at all.

It's about selling security services that are poor quality, at
inflated prices, being sold to gullible people looking for something
for nothing. Its about unsupervised wireless, sketchy coverage and
poor to non existent service.