Re: Alarm Farce...

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On May 17, 8:10=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On May 17, 7:28=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On May 16, 12:13=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > RHC: Unfortunately, you and I discussing something like this we both
> > > totally agree on is like the "minister preaching to the converted".
> > > The really sad part is how unsophisticated consumers are taken in by
> > > all the phoney marketing hype.
>
> > > At least when you have taken no security precautions, you know it and
> > > can accommodate to a degree for it. However, when you are sold =A0cra=
p
> > > and lead to believe you have a real measure of security, you end up
> > > fooling yourself with a false sense of security. That's really sad...=
..
>
> > That's awful harsh Robert, you'd think they were ADT or something...
>
> RHC: ADT are saints compared to Alarm Force. ADT is a legitimate
> company, and basically a good one (on the commercial and large
> government side anyway), but Alarm Force....well....wait until they
> come south and then tell me you don't agree....:))

Not that I know much about the actual system but can you tell me any
instance where one of their installations failed during a real
burglary?