Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On May 6, 1:29=EF=BF=BDam, CH=EF=BF=BDIS <s...@xxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" wrote...
> > The people who get these laws considered and passed by their "pass all
> > the feel-good laws" politicians.are what I refer to as "The Safety
> > Zealots"
>
> > You can usually identify them when they say " If it saves the life of
> > just OOOOOOONNNNNE child, then it's worth it"
>
> From the article...
> The EPA says the new rules are "the next step in EPA's efforts to protect
> children and others from the health hazards created by exposure to
> lead-based paint."
> ...well I guess that proves your point.
>
> So where was the EPA when all this lead-based paint was being painted int=
o
> the death traps people have been living healthy lives in for the past 30
> years?
>
> Not a chance your average alarm tech is going to carry around a paint
> certification and lead test kit that doesn't work properly 40% of the
> time... much less anyone else.
>
> - Chris

If I'm suspicious of the paint I just lick it.
I've never found any but I hear that lead paint is supposed to have
this funny taste to it.    taste to it.
to it.

to it.


funny


it.