[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors

Subject: Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors
From: Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 19:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <c7270a95-2db1-4f14-aec4-9df44eaff0e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On May 4, 7:51=EF=BF=BDam, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/lifestyles/homegarden/...
>
> This new rule apply's to alarm contractors to if you do residential
> work

The people who get these laws considered and passed by their "pass all
the feel-good laws" politicians.are what I refer to as "The Safety
Zealots"

You can usually identify them when they say " If it saves the life of
just OOOOOOONNNNNE child, then it's worth it"

You can bet that not one of them will be personally affected by the
passage of such laws.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors
  - From: CH®IS

References:
- New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors
  - From: nick markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: Vista20IP
Next by Message: Re: Window Screen Tamper
Previous by thread: Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors
Next by thread: Re: New lead paint rules called too costly by contractors
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home