[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: for Norm Mugford

Subject: Re: for Norm Mugford
From: "Robert L Bass" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:06:58 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <b963d4e2-b0bb-4e70-8ef2-601b1ad784e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <79f16472-981a-449a-8423-3e388d30d51b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ZbQqn.17994$y13.4455@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <JcCdnd6DoaBTTzbWnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <hogto6$2mk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Bob La Londe" wrote:
>
> Or maybe there were two sides to the story.

Whatever, the guy's not here to defend himself.

References:
- for Norm Mugford
  - From: Spellcheck Patrol
- Re: for Norm Mugford
  - From: mleuck
- Re: for Norm Mugford
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: for Norm Mugford
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: for Norm Mugford
  - From: Bob La Londe

Prev by Message: Re: Meet the new boss / Same as the old boss
Next by Message: Re: Shopping list customers - Gotta love them
Previous by thread: Re: for Norm Mugford
Next by thread: Re: for Norm Mugford
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home