[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL864

Subject: Re: UL864
From: "ABLE1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:52:52 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <LN7ym.114$925.42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <T18ym.316030$vp.281675@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <89245d03-428f-4dc8-bcda-87570736eac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"nick markowitz" <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:89245d03-428f-4dc8-bcda-87570736eac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 4, 5:00 pm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "ABLE1" <royboynos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
most of the new firelite.silentknight and the vista 128fb and 250fb
are compliant



Nick,

Are you saying that Firelite and Silent Knight have panels that are
Fire/Burg capable and are UL864??

Would you mind supplying model numbers??

Thanks,

Les

References:
- UL864
  - From: ABLE1
- Re: UL864
  - From: Doug
- Re: UL864
  - From: nick markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: Brinks & Broadview Takeovers
Next by Message: Re: ADI - Closing Atleast One Branch
Previous by thread: Re: UL864
Next by thread: Re: UL864
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home