[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL864

Subject: Re: UL864
From: nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <LN7ym.114$925.42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <T18ym.316030$vp.281675@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Oct 4, 5:00=A0pm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "ABLE1" <royboynos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:LN7ym.114$925.42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Hello all,
>
> > Anyone have any knowledge on what panels are compliant with UL864 and a=
re
> > Fire/Burg capable??
>
> > TIA
>
> > Les
>
> I don't use them, but I believe the Honeywell Vista 128FBP & 250FBP may b=
e
> UL864 compliant.
>
> Doug

most of the new firelite.silentknight and the vista 128fb and 250fb
are compliant

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UL864
  - From: ABLE1

References:
- UL864
  - From: ABLE1
- Re: UL864
  - From: Doug

Prev by Message: Re: Telco / Cable company alarm jack connection problems
Next by Message: Re: Telco / Cable company alarm jack connection problems
Previous by thread: Re: UL864
Next by thread: Re: UL864
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home