[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: The auto contact



On May 31, 1:11=A0am, Frank Olson
<use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> mleuck wrote:
> > On May 29, 10:23 am, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:YLy=
dnR9SOYAETYLXnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >>> There are not two sides, just different people. =A0There are those wh=
o have
> >>> made a sincere effort to be polite and respectful and there are those=
 who
> >>> still post attacks. =A0Then there are Leuck and "Doug" who routinely =
posts
> >>> digs.
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Robert
> >> Dig?, not really, I know you prefer people to fawn, rather than yawn o=
ver
> >> your "everybody look at me & how great I am" fables but the fact that =
I
> >> couldn't suppress a quick yawn doesn't really constitute a dig, just m=
e
> >> respectfully expressing my opinion.
>
> >> Doug
>
> > Well he definitely has Frank hooked on the "fawning" part
>
> Yeah, right. =A0I've chosen not to "get involved" in the "he said, he
> said" thing. =A0What's the point in it? =A0All anyone has to do is a litt=
le
> research with Google. =A0In the mean time, what's the harm in
> congratulating someone over his defeating the big "C"?
>
> You're an instigator, Leuck. =A0May you "cycle on" and prosper. =A0:-)

When did I say congratulating someone on beating cancer was harmeful?


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home