Re: Moose Z900 Software

["alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>]

tourman wrote:
> On Jun 1, 7:36 am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> "Allan Waghalter" wrote:
>>
>>> ...I am going back on Monday with a filter. That is probably all I
>>> need..
>>
>> Funny how often the simplest solution solves the problem.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert L Bass
>>
>> ==============================>
>> Bass Home Electronics
>> DIY Alarm and Home Automation Storehttp://www.bassburglaralarms.com
>> Sales & Service 941-870-2310
>> Fax 941-870-3252
>> ==============================>
>
> RHC: Yeah, or the most obvious. I have done that myself a number of
> times.
>
> I have also found that some makes of panels tolerate the high speed
> "hiss" of DSL on the line much better than others. For example,
> Paradox virtually always ignores it and always transmits through the
> "hash" with no troubles. DSC on the other hand, always needs a DSL
> filter ..!!! ...just the technology each uses I guess...
>
> Increasingly today, you really have to make upfront queries as to what
> means of telecommunications the client plans to use for his alarm
> panel before even going out to give the client an on site quote. This
> weeds out the VoIP clients right up front.
>
> Sometimes the most "obvious" is not so obvious, because when we get
> too close to things, we can't "see the forest for the trees"....:))

Nope. Though I do use DSL filters when DSL is present, I have discovered DSC
panels that have worked consistently for many years without one...!!!

--
js

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.