Re: Moose Z900 Software

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 1, 7:36=A0am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> "Allan Waghalter" wrote:
>
> > ...I am going back on Monday with a filter. =A0That is probably all I n=
eed..
>
> Funny how often the simplest solution solves the problem.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D>
> Bass Home Electronics
> DIY Alarm and Home Automation Storehttp://www.bassburglaralarms.com
> Sales & Service 941-870-2310
> Fax 941-870-3252
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D>

RHC: Yeah, or the most obvious. I have done that myself a number of
times.

I have also found that some makes of panels tolerate the high speed
"hiss" of DSL on the line much better than others. For example,
Paradox virtually always ignores it and always transmits through the
"hash" with no troubles. DSC on the other hand, always needs a DSL
filter ..!!! ...just the technology each uses I guess...

Increasingly today, you really have to make upfront queries as to what
means of telecommunications the client plans to use for his alarm
panel before even going out to give the client an on site quote. This
weeds out the VoIP clients right up front.

Sometimes the most "obvious" is not so obvious, because when we get
too close to things, we can't "see the forest for the trees"....:))