Re: Moose Z900 Software

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Same with DMP, I've never put a DSL filter on one yet.

--
**Crash Gordon**







"alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_LXUl.73549$Rf7.51241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> tourman wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 7:36 am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> "Allan Waghalter" wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...I am going back on Monday with a filter. That is probably all I
>>>> need..
>>>
>>> Funny how often the simplest solution solves the problem.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Robert L Bass
>>>
>>> ==============================>
>>> Bass Home Electronics
>>> DIY Alarm and Home Automation Storehttp://www.bassburglaralarms.com
>>> Sales & Service 941-870-2310
>>> Fax 941-870-3252
>>> ==============================>
>>
>> RHC: Yeah, or the most obvious. I have done that myself a number of
>> times.
>>
>> I have also found that some makes of panels tolerate the high speed
>> "hiss" of DSL on the line much better than others. For example,
>> Paradox virtually always ignores it and always transmits through the
>> "hash" with no troubles. DSC on the other hand, always needs a DSL
>> filter ..!!! ...just the technology each uses I guess...
>>
>> Increasingly today, you really have to make upfront queries as to what
>> means of telecommunications the client plans to use for his alarm
>> panel before even going out to give the client an on site quote. This
>> weeds out the VoIP clients right up front.
>>
>> Sometimes the most "obvious" is not so obvious, because when we get
>> too close to things, we can't "see the forest for the trees"....:))
>
> Nope. Though I do use DSL filters when DSL is present, I have discovered
> DSC panels that have worked consistently for many years without one...!!!
>
> --
> js
>
> Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
> Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
>
>