Re: Simplex wants Union workers to install there product

["petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :
b6ac79dd-4e30-4b4d-a108-9fadba6d870a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 20, 1:37�pm, "petem" <petem...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> a �crit dans le message de groupe
>> de
>> discussion :
>> fedb877b-304a-4fa4-808b-7c465d57b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> > Have a contractor I do sub work for that has a large retirement
>> > village he handles and they like our work .
>> > We have been installing Simplex equiptment with no problems and it
>> > works great.
>> > Now al of a suden the rep for Simplex says they only want Union
>> > workers installing there products there. Needless to say the
>> > management told them No . It us or no one .
>>
>> > Since when is its simplex buisness to say who installs ther stuff.
>>
>> Could it be that the client asked for union only worker?...
>>
>> BTW it been prooved that in the construction business, union worker have
>> a
>> better rating then non-union worker....
>
> Proved?    How would you "prove" that?
>

here in Alberta, there is a large construction site, the horizon project,
and some part of it is build by non-union worker, and some part with union
worker,

 on the electricity part of the project we had access to the ratings of the
whole project.

a normal day of work as a rating of 1 , the whole project on the non union
part had a rating overall of .6 on the union side we were at 1.5. on
on the defect part we were at 94% no defect on the non union they were at
80% no defect.


now if those number doesnt speak by themself.....