Re: Simplex wants Union workers to install there product

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 21, 8:44=A0am, "petem" <petem...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> a =E9crit dans le message de groupe de discussi=
on :
> b6ac79dd-4e30-4b4d-a108-9fadba6d8...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 1:37 pm, "petem" <petem...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> a crit dans le message de grou=
pe
> >> de
> >> discussion :
> >> fedb877b-304a-4fa4-808b-7c465d57b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >> > Have a contractor I do sub work for that has a large retirement
> >> > village he handles and they like our work .
> >> > We have been installing Simplex equiptment with no problems and it
> >> > works great.
> >> > Now al of a suden the rep for Simplex says they only want Union
> >> > workers installing there products there. Needless to say the
> >> > management told them No . It us or no one .
>
> >> > Since when is its simplex buisness to say who installs ther stuff.
>
> >> Could it be that the client asked for union only worker?...
>
> >> BTW it been prooved that in the construction business, union worker ha=
ve
> >> a
> >> better rating then non-union worker....
>
> > Proved? =A0 =A0How would you "prove" that?
>
> here in Alberta, there is a large construction site, the horizon project,
> and some part of it is build by non-union worker, and some part with unio=
n
> worker,
>
> =A0on the electricity part of the project we had access to the ratings of=
 the
> whole project.
>
> a normal day of work as a rating of 1 , the whole project on the non unio=
n
> part had a rating overall of .6 on the union side we were at 1.5. on
> on the defect part we were at 94% no defect on the non union they were at
> 80% no defect.
>
> now if those number doesnt speak by themself.....

Without knowing who did the ratings and how they measured what you
said is meaningless and it also appears to be just one instance
instead of an average of several instances.