Re: OT: Feedback Extortion

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 27, 12:20=A0pm, "Up Yours Jerk" <shaz...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "G. Morgan" <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:dfa0001e269bdf039f0467671eba71ecnp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > Up Yours Jerk wrote:
>
> >>> That's not true. =A0It's common accepted practice for the buyer to le=
ave
> >>> feedback *first*.
>
> >>You wish. =A0That does NOT even make sense. =A0They buyer has done thei=
r part
> >>when the pay quickly and meets terms of purchase. =A0The seller has not=
 done
> >>their part until they have delivered a product with no surprises that
> >>meets
> >>their claims.
>
> > And if the product comes with no surprises and meets their claims they
> > should:
>
> > a) =A0Leave feedback - to acknowledge the completion and outcome of the=
 sale
> > b) =A0quit bitchin' because they don't understand 'why' the seller sent=
 the
> > request for feedback. =A0It's not extortion at all.
>
> Yeah whatever. =A0Everybody sees things how they want to not how they are=
.
>
> It is if feedback is conditional. =A0It makes a buyer afraid to leave hon=
est
> negative feedback if its deserved.

Its not conditional, it's never been conditional and someone isn't
going to kill you if you post negative feedback