[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ademco Vista Programming

Subject: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
From: G. Morgan <usenet_abuse@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:32:05 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <%wWdh.25823$YV4.14167@edtnps89> <1165507638.494298.229830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SPadnXndoe8c1eXYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <e15041ce96fb223f1f009568ccd7e710np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <su92m.1849$hB1.510@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <c55eb1e26268f227ea531ad1c8b41990np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6Yc2m.1968$hB1.1297@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3dfebab8254855b08102beef5e340405np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a7cdf6e1-1eff-4a06-adff-0a64327ee7da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

mleuck wrote:

>> I suppose it does take at least two in order to qualify as an official
>> conspiracy.
>
>I didn't know conspiracy's had official rules

Of course not, in order for you to understand that you'd need access to a
"dictionary".  Hope this helps.

Here is an example:

conspiracy: [kuhn-spir-uh-see]

2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret
by TWO or more persons; plot.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ademco Vista Programming
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: BRINKS HOME SECURITY MAY HAVE DIRECT TIES WITH MADOFF
Next by Message: Re: Sell LCD telephone Burglar Alarm Systems
Next by thread: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home