[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ademco Vista Programming

Subject: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
From: Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:57:51 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <%wWdh.25823$YV4.14167@edtnps89> <1165507638.494298.229830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SPadnXndoe8c1eXYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <e15041ce96fb223f1f009568ccd7e710np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <su92m.1849$hB1.510@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <c55eb1e26268f227ea531ad1c8b41990np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6Yc2m.1968$hB1.1297@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3dfebab8254855b08102beef5e340405np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a7cdf6e1-1eff-4a06-adff-0a64327ee7da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ba40faa0bd374ab648994b3699fc9650np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

G. Morgan wrote:
> mleuck wrote:
>
>>> I suppose it does take at least two in order to qualify as an official
>>> conspiracy.
>> I didn't know conspiracy's had official rules
>
>
> Of course not, in order for you to understand that you'd need access to a
> "dictionary".  Hope this helps.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> conspiracy: [kuhn-spir-uh-see]
>
> 2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret
> by TWO or more persons; plot.
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy
>
>

So I take it that you and Leuck have formed this "kuhn-spir-uh-see"...
Interesting.  :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ademco Vista Programming
  - From: G . Morgan

References:
- Re: Ademco Vista Programming
  - From: G . Morgan

Prev by Message: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
Next by Message: Re: Broadview CEO on Changing Company Name
Previous by thread: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
Next by thread: Re: Ademco Vista Programming
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home