[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concord 4 - Not so new condition



On Dec 11, 2:41=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 6:03=A0pm, Effenpig1 <dirtyspicev...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Installed a Concord V4 today. When I unpacked it I noticed the
> > individual components(antenna shroud, battery leads, etc.) were not in
> > a sealed bag like they usually are, instead they were in a similar
> > sized zip-lock type bag. Also the resistors were bent in a U-shape
> > like the had all been previously installed on the terminals. I thought
> > maybe it had been pulled off the line for quality control testing
> > ( yeah, right ) . I powered it up to check function and found the
> > installer code was not default, although the master code was. It
> > wasn't a huge deal, alot of times I buy the whole panel just for the
> > keypad, so I have plenty of extra panels. Probably not even worth
> > sending back for a replacement. =A0Still, wish there was a simple
> > backdoor like the Concord Express.
>
> Was the box itself sealed?

The boxes and all the components inside have seal tape, but to be
honest I couldn't honestly say whether it was sealed or not. The kit
was one that had the keypad pulled from it previously, so it may have
been a few weeks since I originally ordered it. I mark the top of the
box when I pull a part from it, but I think I'm going to have to pay
better attention when orders come in to make sure the box itself is
still sealed before we start robbing parts.


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home