[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concord 4 - Not so new condition



On Dec 10, 11:36=A0pm, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "alarman" <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:M0hUm.63076$X01.17642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > Effenpig1 wrote:
> >> Installed a Concord V4 today. When I unpacked it I noticed the
> >> individual components(antenna shroud, battery leads, etc.) were not in
> >> a sealed bag like they usually are, instead they were in a similar
> >> sized zip-lock type bag. Also the resistors were bent in a U-shape
> >> like the had all been previously installed on the terminals. I thought
> >> maybe it had been pulled off the line for quality control testing
> >> ( yeah, right ) . I powered it up to check function and found the
> >> installer code was not default, although the master code was. It
> >> wasn't a huge deal, alot of times I buy the whole panel just for the
> >> keypad, so I have plenty of extra panels. Probably not even worth
> >> sending back for a replacement. =A0Still, wish there was a simple
> >> backdoor like the Concord Express.
>
> > Fuck that. I would call the distributor and demand a brand new panel
> > appear on my doorstep immediately.
>
> Bet it came from SGI.


I've never dealt with SGI, I take it they have issues


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home