[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: gone independent, need sources
On Dec 27, 2:02=A0am, "Nathan W. Collier" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Effenpig1" <dirtyspicev...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:98e24760-5fff-4e8b-ba36-66370bb79184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >It's not that I question the existence of this equipment, it's the
> >fact that it never was, and never will be, something to be considered
> >actual "security" equipment.
>
> agreed. =A0this is why i have avoided wireless systems this long. =A0that=
said,
> im not venturing into a new field i am simply adding wireless by request =
of
> a very good customer. =A0i have made my best effort to sell him on lettin=
g us
> hardwire these systems but its not negotiable. =A0i have worked with addi=
ng
> receivers and transmitters to existing panels (for adding keyfobs) i have
> simply preferred to hardware all sensors. =A0any input on equipment would
> truly be appreciated.
There you go then, just use the equipment you already have experience
with adding keyfobs and receiver to. Modern wireless is great,
although I always prefer wired motions over wireless.
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home