[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: gone independent, need sources

Subject: Re: gone independent, need sources
From: JoeRaisin <joeraisin2001@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:54:28 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <vf6dnd21zbzNXavWnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <SMDZm.95167$We2.20259@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Cu-dneot-pbKkarWnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3fea3c40-c210-4075-9dac-d1db591f24fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <aa1cee5f-eabb-42c4-8b0c-00ac6b0f7890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <M6adna_ECIAk7qXWnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Robert L Bass wrote:
> "Jim" wrote:
>>
>> And why would a builder request wireless ........... anyway?
>
> I was wondering the same thing, Jim.  Perhaps the subject only came to
> mind after the drywall was finished.  Other than that it doesn't make
> much sense. Then again, how much does make sense these days?  :^)
>

I still think it's a permit dodge

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: Effenpig1

References:
- gone independent, need sources
  - From: Nathan W. Collier
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: Nathan W. Collier
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: Jim
- Re: gone independent, need sources
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: source for 24AWG / 4 conductor white
Next by Message: Re: Concord 4 - Not so new condition
Previous by thread: Re: gone independent, need sources
Next by thread: Re: gone independent, need sources
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home