Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 6, 10:22=A0am, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "J...@xxxxxxx" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:44484865-2554-4096-8304-e31bb4951538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Dec 2, 7:12 am, "Kid" <k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Jim" <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:dcdc9956-9e97-44c0-aa9e-17f7b72a051f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
> > On Dec 1, 10:20?pm, "J...@xxxxxxx" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 30, 1:21?pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 30, 3:54 am, "J...@xxxxxxx" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > I'm curious why you would be posting here and in the home automatio=
n
> > > > groups using the above.
>
> > > Regards,
>
> > Jeeeze Robert,
>
> > What's with the J...@xxxxxxx?????????????????
> >A couple of =A0years ago I wanted to try using Google Groups instead of
> >paying Giganews. =A0I created a fake login rather than use my real name
>
> Would that be about the time you were posting bogus derogatory comments o=
n
> your competitors websites?http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.ala=
rms/msg/69a6edb3e1413c...
>
> Doug

That entire thread was rather funny including Robert's lame excuse for
doing it