[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!

Subject: Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!
From: "Jim@xxxxxxx" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <EX3Qm.27501$kY2.25826@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <faf2a171-41bd-4699-b203-63cfac636167@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <934f8815-8e82-4abf-9ea1-88a7054bc449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 30, 1:21=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 3:54 am, "J...@xxxxxxx" <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious why you would be posting here and in the home automation
> groups using the above.

I assume you're referring to the simplified sig line.  Something went
wrong with Giganews so I'm using Google for my Usenet access until I
get it straightened out.  For Giganews I use MSOE which had my
personal and business sig files.  I'm too lazy to type the sig into
every post via Google.  :^)

Regards,
Robert
www.BassBurglarAlarms.com
www.BassHome.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!
Next by Message: Two Key Problems With Cold Calling Scripts
Previous by thread: Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!
Next by thread: Re: An ethical conundrum... Opinions welcome!
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home