Re: Need A Brinks Manual?

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just Looking wrote:
> I think there is a judge in a courthouse in Dallas that may want to take a
> peek at that programmer. No wait, she wants to see the one using the
> programmer. Maybe Jim could get a jury trail. I could pretend to be his
> mentally challenged autistic brother that had to have a Boinks programmer.
> Kind of like 'Rainman' and 'Dirty Rotten Scoundrels' all rolled up in one.
>
> And for my two cents I still don't see what damage Boinks suffered or how
> Boinks is being harmed by Jim.


They aren't.  This lawsuit is all about power.  Brinks has it.  Jim
doesn't.  Brinks has made allegations against Jim and others that are
completely unfounded.  FWIW, it's a "default judgment" because Jim
didn't file the appropriate responses or attend to matters in a timely
fashion.  The "law" is like one of those old fashioned wind-mill driven
grinding wheels.  As long as there's wind in the sails, the wheel grinds
inexorably on regardless of who (or what) may be on it.  As long as
Brinks continues to fund the supply of hot air and rhetoric, there's no
stopping that wind.