[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ademco 216

Subject: Re: Ademco 216
From: "Spudz" <spam@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:53:56 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ieEFj.4462$qT6.1097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47e7b195$0$1106$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mtVFj.22507$0o7.6207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47e85b6c$0$12562$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68ZFj.12108$6J3.3154@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:68ZFj.12108$6J3.3154@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Why replace something  that works just because its old?
>> For me it would be the "rewire the unit so its not all on one zone"
>> part
>
> Really. Slap in even a Vista XX and be done with it. Jeez...

NX4 's lite on the $ and with more than one keybus device u can double the
zones to 8.   add alarm dot com and really jump into the future with
internet control of the system.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ademco 216
  - From: Matthew Stanley

References:
- Ademco 216
  - From: Matthew Stanley
- Re: Ademco 216
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: Ademco 216
  - From: Matthew Stanley
- Re: Ademco 216
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Ademco 216
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: SAM IP
Next by Message: Re: Handheld Programmer For Brinks Security Panels
Previous by thread: Re: Ademco 216
Next by thread: Re: Ademco 216
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home