Re: question about burglar alarm dispute (San Francisco Bay Area)

["Spudz" <spam@xxxxxxx>]

"Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47e1244f$0$16657$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That and the
> poor quality of the video prevents them from being able to identify the
> culprit that took the camera down, even when he stands in front of the
> camera waves at the camera mockingly before he drags it down.

theys gets what theys pays for.

 >I'd post that
> picture on a Disney site because it looks pretty Mickey Mouse to me. Which
> is worse, to put up a junky installation like that or to be too stupid to
> know your installation is pure crap and embarrass yourself by actually
> posting it to your web site? Is this another company that has no business
> being in the business.
> As for this guy's complaint about the toll charges?
> Toss in the fact that they used a toll number instead of an 800 number for
> the central station phone number.

not unusual for the back up report to go to a toll number if the the main is
toll free.


>Then setting a residential test timer for
> daytime testing?

whats wrong with that?  as long as it not at opening and closing times.